C-07
Internal quality control and control charting
Turning individual control results into a picture of whether the method is stable, and reading a trend before it becomes a failure.
TRAINING / C-07
The course
Turning individual control results into a picture of whether the method is stable, and reading a trend before it becomes a failure.
Who it is for
01 / 05Analysts and quality staff who already run controls and want the data to tell them something, and technical managers who review QC across several methods.
Some arithmetic is involved and it is all built up in the room. Delegates work on charts from real control data during the day.
What is covered
02 / 05The syllabus below is the standard shape of the course. It is adjusted to the matrices, methods and instruments you actually run, which is agreed before delivery rather than discovered on the day.
Chart types
Shewhart individuals, mean and range charts, and choosing between them
Establishing limits
Warning and action limits from your own data, not from the specification
Trend rules
Runs, drifts, shifts and the rule sets that detect them
Out of control
Distinguishing a genuine shift from an ordinary outlier
Re-baselining
When limits should be recalculated and when doing so hides a problem
Review
Making QC review a short routine task rather than a monthly project
What you leave able to do
03 / 05Courses are written around what a delegate can do afterwards, not what was presented to them. These are the outcomes this one is built to produce.
- Build a control chart from your own data and set defensible limits on it.
- Read a chart and say whether the method is stable, drifting or shifted.
- Apply a trend rule set consistently instead of judging charts by eye.
- Decide when re-baselining is legitimate and when it is concealment.
Why this course exists
04 / 05Control limits set from the product specification instead of from method performance is the single most common charting error, and it makes the chart useless in both directions: it stays silent while the method degrades, then alarms on results that were never a problem.
A chart nobody reads is a filing exercise. A chart read weekly for two minutes is the cheapest early warning a laboratory can own.
How it is delivered
05 / 05Delivered over 1 day, at your site or at the laboratory, in English or Arabic. Sessions are built around real records, real data and real failures rather than slides of clause numbers, and the people delivering them spend the rest of the week doing the thing being taught.
Group size is agreed in advance — practical sessions are capped so that everyone works rather than watches. An attendance certificate is issued to each delegate on completion.
Ask about any subject not listed here. If it is not something we teach well, we will say so rather than build it for the sake of the booking.
At a glance
- Duration
- 1 day
- Delivered
- On site or at the laboratory
- Language
- English or Arabic
- Certificate
- Attendance certificate issued
CONTINUE
Where to next
Method validation and verification
The difference between validating a method and verifying one, and how to evidence either so it survives an assessment.
ReadMethod performance and result validity
Accuracy, precision, bias and recovery — what each one measures, and which of them your result actually depends on.
ReadAll courses
The full catalogue, grouped by subject.
ReadRequests are read at the bench.
Send the sample question or the instrument list. It is read by a bench professional, not routed through a ticket queue. Call +966 59 637 8052 or write to lab-mgr@qsinexus.com.