C-06
Quality control in chemical and microbiological testing
The controls that run alongside your samples, what each one is protecting you from, and what to do when one fails.
TRAINING / C-06
The course
The controls that run alongside your samples, what each one is protecting you from, and what to do when one fails.
Who it is for
01 / 05Analysts who prepare and run controls, and supervisors who review the resulting data before results are released.
Covers both the chemical and the microbiological bench, because the principle is the same and the practice differs — which is exactly the comparison that makes it land.
What is covered
02 / 05The syllabus below is the standard shape of the course. It is adjusted to the matrices, methods and instruments you actually run, which is agreed before delivery rather than discovered on the day.
Control types
Method blanks, reagent blanks, duplicates, spikes, reference materials, positive and negative controls
What each protects
Matching the control to the failure mode it is there to catch
Frequency
Per batch, per run, per analyst — deciding it rather than inheriting it
Acceptance criteria
Where the limits come from and how they are reviewed
Media and strain control
Growth promotion, sterility checks and control organisms on the micro bench
Failure
Invalidating a batch, investigating, and what may and may not be re-reported
What you leave able to do
03 / 05Courses are written around what a delegate can do afterwards, not what was presented to them. These are the outcomes this one is built to produce.
- Build a QC scheme for a method that catches its real failure modes rather than the generic ones.
- Judge a control result against its criterion without consulting anyone.
- Handle a failed control correctly, including the samples that ran with it.
- Explain to an auditor why your QC frequency is what it is.
Why this course exists
04 / 05Running controls is nearly universal. Knowing what each control is protecting against is not — which is how laboratories end up running a full control set out of habit while the one control that would catch their actual recurring failure is not in the batch.
The failure handling matters more than the running. A failed control that quietly gets repeated until it passes is worse than no control at all, because it produces a record that says everything was fine.
How it is delivered
05 / 05Delivered over 1 day, at your site or at the laboratory, in English or Arabic. Sessions are built around real records, real data and real failures rather than slides of clause numbers, and the people delivering them spend the rest of the week doing the thing being taught.
Group size is agreed in advance — practical sessions are capped so that everyone works rather than watches. An attendance certificate is issued to each delegate on completion.
Ask about any subject not listed here. If it is not something we teach well, we will say so rather than build it for the sake of the booking.
At a glance
- Duration
- 1 day
- Delivered
- On site or at the laboratory
- Language
- English or Arabic
- Certificate
- Attendance certificate issued
CONTINUE
Where to next
Method validation and verification
The difference between validating a method and verifying one, and how to evidence either so it survives an assessment.
ReadMethod performance and result validity
Accuracy, precision, bias and recovery — what each one measures, and which of them your result actually depends on.
ReadAll courses
The full catalogue, grouped by subject.
ReadRequests are read at the bench.
Send the sample question or the instrument list. It is read by a bench professional, not routed through a ticket queue. Call +966 59 637 8052 or write to lab-mgr@qsinexus.com.